Technology-Enhanced Grammar Activities in English as a Foreign Language Writing Accuracy
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of the study was to determine the effects of technology-enhanced grammatical activities on writing accuracy in English as a foreign language at a Higher Technological Institute. It involved participants aged 18 to 30 from an A1 level English course according to the CEFR in the institution's foreign language program. The teacher-researcher designed a mixed-method study in which homogeneous and intact control and experimental groups were established to implement an intervention plan based on technology-enhanced activities. Data were collected through a pre-test and post-test, questionnaire, and survey. The results indicated that the experimental group students outperformed the control group and also expressed positive attitudes towards the technology-enhanced activities. These findings suggest that technology-enhanced grammatical activities improved students' writing accuracy in English as a foreign language and positively affected their perception of technology application in the classroom. The outcomes of this study have significant implications for the design of technology-use activities, as well as for teachers of English as a foreign language.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Los autores transfieren los derechos de publicación a la revista en todos sus formatos y medios digitales.
En lo referente al Copyright CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Esta revista está bajo una licencia de https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir: copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar: remezclar, transformar y construir sobre el material
- El licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades siempre y cuando usted siga los términos de la licencia.
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución: debe dar el crédito apropiado, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se hicieron cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de ninguna manera que sugiera que el licenciante lo respalda a usted o a su uso.
- No comercial: no puede utilizar el material con fines comerciales.
- ShareAlike - Si remezcla, transforma o construye sobre el material, debe distribuir sus contribuciones bajo la misma licencia que el original.
- Sin restricciones adicionales: no puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otros de hacer cualquier cosa que la licencia permita.
Avisos:
No tiene que cumplir con la licencia para los elementos del material en el dominio público o cuando su uso esté permitido por una excepción o limitación aplicable.
No se dan garantías. Es posible que la licencia no le dé todos los permisos necesarios para su uso previsto. Por ejemplo, otros derechos como la publicidad, la privacidad o los derechos morales pueden limitar la forma en que utiliza el material.
References
Beglar, D., & Nemoto, T. (2014). Developing Likert-scale questionnaires. JALT2013 Conference Proceedings, 1–8.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (Fourth edi).
CES, C. de E. S. (2019). Reglamento de Régimen Académico. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational Research. In Pearson Education (Fourth edi).
Doyle, L., Brady, A. M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987108093962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987108093962
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Stephen, K. (1982). Language Two (p. 313). Oxford University Press.
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
Gopalan, M., Rosinger, J., & Ahn, J. Bin. (2020). Use of Quasi-Experimental Research Designs in Education Research: Growth, Promise, and Challenges. In Review of Research in Education (pp. 218–243). AERA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302
Kopp, K. (2015). Moving Beyond Computers. In Integrating Technology into the Curriculum (Issue 2015, pp. 111–128).
Kuru, S. (2019). A qualitative study on a situated experience of technology integration: reflections from pre-service teachers and students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552974
Mahmoudi, E., Samad, A. bt A., & Razak, N. Z. B. A. (2012). Attitude and Students’ Performance in Computer Assisted English Language Learning (CAELL) for Learning Vocabulary. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.293
Munn, P., & Drever, E. (1990). Using Questionnaires in Small-Scale Research. A Teachers’ Guide. (Issue 4). http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED326488
Polio, C., & Shea, M. C. (2014). An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.003
Roberts, L. D., & Allen, P. J. (2015). Exploring ethical issues associated with using online surveys in educational research. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1024421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1024421
Romano, F. (2019). Grammatical accuracy in EAP writing. In Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Vol. 41). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100773