Influence of fine motor skills in the prewriting process of the Initial Level. Sublevel 2
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of fine motor skills at the beginning level is essential to acquire adequate writing skills. The purpose of this research was to diagnose the influence of fine motor skills for the development of prewriting, which was carried out on 55 students of Initial Education, sublevel 2 of the Millennium Educational Unit “Jatun Kuraka Otavalo”. To analyze the study variables, tests and a graphic motor observation sheet were applied. Likewise, the degree of correlation between the variables was established to be able to verify how fine motor skills influence the prewriting process. The methodology based on direct observation of the sample was used and its results were analyzed through descriptive and correlational procedures. The results obtained determine that of the 55 children to whom the subtest was administered, only 20 were able to thread the needle and 23 could draw 9 or more parts of the body, which indicates that there are fine motor problems. From the correlational analysis it is established that the fine motor variable correlates mostly with the prewriting variables.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in Ecos de la Academia retain copyright over their articles and grant Editorial UTN, through the journal, a non-exclusive, free-of-charge, worldwide licence for the publication, distribution, preservation, and dissemination of their articles in all formats and digital media.
The contents published by the journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This licence allows users to copy, redistribute, remix, transform, and build upon the material in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the authors, Ecos de la Academia is cited, a link to the licence is included, and any changes made are indicated.
No legal terms or technological measures may be applied that restrict the uses permitted by the licence. This licence does not replace other rights that may apply, such as privacy, publicity, image, or moral rights.
How to Cite
References
Ajuriaguerra, J. de et al. (1973). Ficha de observación de la motricidad gráfica. Chile: Universidad Andrés Bello.
Berger, K. (2006). Psicología de desarrollo: infancia y adolescencia. Madrid: Editorial Medica Panamericana.
Bruner, J. (1983). Acción, pensamiento y lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza – Psicología
Cohen, R. (1983). En defensa del aprendizaje precoz. Barcelona: Nueva Paideia.
Collado, S., Pérez, C. y Carrillo, J. (2004). Motricidad: fundamentos y aplicaciones. Madrid: Dikynson.
Cuetos, F. (2012). Psicología de la escritura. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer.
Ferré, J. (2013). Neuropsicopedagogía infantil. Bases neurofuncionales del aprendizaje cognitivo y emocional. Editorial Lebón.
García, J. y Gonzalez, D: (2000). Dificultades de aprendizaje e intervención psicopedagógica. Lectura y escritura. Madrid: Eos.
González, A. (2012). Escritura y habilidades perceptivo motoras. Universidad de Salamanca, 4, 201-222.
González, A., Lica, M. y Ruiz, D. (2010). Relación entre los ejercicios de motricidad fina con dificultades de escritura: análisis de un caso. Revista de Educación y desarrollo, 13, 17-23.
Justo, E. (2014). Desarrollo Psicomotor en Educación Infantil: bases para la intervención en psicomotricidad. Almería: Ed. Universidad de Almería.
López Belda, A.M. (2006). La disgrafía. Madrid: Xandró.
Maeland, A. (1992). Handwriting and Perceptual Motor Skills in Clumsy Dysgraphic and Normal Children. Perceptual and motor skills, 75, 1207-1227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.75.8.1207-1217
Manashi, B. (2017). Learning difficulties of disable childrens. Shree Sadashiva Campus, 4, 394-397
Marchant, I. H. (1982). Test de desarrollo psicomotor de 2 a 5 años (TEPSI). Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2014). Currículo de Educación Inicial. Quito: DINADEP.
Moore, O.K (1986): File responsive environments Project. Chicago: Aldin
Piaget, J. (1952). The origen of intelligence inthe child. Londres: Routledge y Kegan Paul. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
Piaget, J. (1972). Psicología de la inteligencia. Buenos Aires: Ed. Psique.
Piaget, J. (1991). Seis estudios de Psicología. Barcelona: Labor, S.A.
Piaget, J. y Inheleber, B. (1956). The child conception of space. Londres: Routledge y Kegan Paul.
Rigal, R. (2006). Educación Motriz y educación psicomotriz en Preescolar y Primaria. Barcelona: Inde.
Saldaña Rios, A., & Chávez Epiquén, A. (2020). La Grafomotricidad y su efecto en la Preescritura en niños de cinco años en la Institución Educativa Inicial Nº 424 Jesús María – Manantay - Coronel Portillo –2018. Sendas, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.47192/rcs.v1i1.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47192/rcs.v1i1.20
Sugrañes, E. y Ángels, M. (2008). La educación psicomotriz (3-8 años). Barcelona: Graó.
Valentini, M. Valentina, L. (2018). The importance of the body in writing. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 8, 618-626.
Vallés, A. (2004). Dislexia 3. Programa para la recuperación de las dificultades lectoescritoras. Valencia: Promolibro.
Vallés, A. (2004). Dislexia 3. Programa para la recuperación de las dificultades lectoescritoras. Valencia: Promolibro.
Viso, J. R. (2003). Prevenir y reeducar la disgrafía. Madrid: ICCE.
Volman, M. J. M., van Schendel, B. M., y Jongmans, M. J. (2006). Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: A search for underlying mechanisms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 451–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.60.4.451