Influence of fine motor skills in the prewriting process of the Initial Level. Sublevel 2
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of fine motor skills at the beginning level is essential to acquire adequate writing skills. The purpose of this research was to diagnose the influence of fine motor skills for the development of prewriting, which was carried out on 55 students of Initial Education, sublevel 2 of the Millennium Educational Unit “Jatun Kuraka Otavalo”. To analyze the study variables, tests and a graphic motor observation sheet were applied. Likewise, the degree of correlation between the variables was established to be able to verify how fine motor skills influence the prewriting process. The methodology based on direct observation of the sample was used and its results were analyzed through descriptive and correlational procedures. The results obtained determine that of the 55 children to whom the subtest was administered, only 20 were able to thread the needle and 23 could draw 9 or more parts of the body, which indicates that there are fine motor problems. From the correlational analysis it is established that the fine motor variable correlates mostly with the prewriting variables.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors transfer the publication rights to the journal in all its formats and digital media.
Regarding Copyright CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, this journal is under a license of https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.
You are free to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
2.Non-Commercial:You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
3. ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
4.No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or when your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not grant you all the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
LEGAL CODE CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
References
Ajuriaguerra, J. de et al. (1973). Ficha de observación de la motricidad gráfica. Chile: Universidad Andrés Bello.
Berger, K. (2006). Psicología de desarrollo: infancia y adolescencia. Madrid: Editorial Medica Panamericana.
Bruner, J. (1983). Acción, pensamiento y lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza – Psicología
Cohen, R. (1983). En defensa del aprendizaje precoz. Barcelona: Nueva Paideia.
Collado, S., Pérez, C. y Carrillo, J. (2004). Motricidad: fundamentos y aplicaciones. Madrid: Dikynson.
Cuetos, F. (2012). Psicología de la escritura. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer.
Ferré, J. (2013). Neuropsicopedagogía infantil. Bases neurofuncionales del aprendizaje cognitivo y emocional. Editorial Lebón.
García, J. y Gonzalez, D: (2000). Dificultades de aprendizaje e intervención psicopedagógica. Lectura y escritura. Madrid: Eos.
González, A. (2012). Escritura y habilidades perceptivo motoras. Universidad de Salamanca, 4, 201-222.
González, A., Lica, M. y Ruiz, D. (2010). Relación entre los ejercicios de motricidad fina con dificultades de escritura: análisis de un caso. Revista de Educación y desarrollo, 13, 17-23.
Justo, E. (2014). Desarrollo Psicomotor en Educación Infantil: bases para la intervención en psicomotricidad. Almería: Ed. Universidad de Almería.
López Belda, A.M. (2006). La disgrafía. Madrid: Xandró.
Maeland, A. (1992). Handwriting and Perceptual Motor Skills in Clumsy Dysgraphic and Normal Children. Perceptual and motor skills, 75, 1207-1227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.75.8.1207-1217
Manashi, B. (2017). Learning difficulties of disable childrens. Shree Sadashiva Campus, 4, 394-397
Marchant, I. H. (1982). Test de desarrollo psicomotor de 2 a 5 años (TEPSI). Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
Ministerio de Educación del Ecuador. (2014). Currículo de Educación Inicial. Quito: DINADEP.
Moore, O.K (1986): File responsive environments Project. Chicago: Aldin
Piaget, J. (1952). The origen of intelligence inthe child. Londres: Routledge y Kegan Paul. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
Piaget, J. (1972). Psicología de la inteligencia. Buenos Aires: Ed. Psique.
Piaget, J. (1991). Seis estudios de Psicología. Barcelona: Labor, S.A.
Piaget, J. y Inheleber, B. (1956). The child conception of space. Londres: Routledge y Kegan Paul.
Rigal, R. (2006). Educación Motriz y educación psicomotriz en Preescolar y Primaria. Barcelona: Inde.
Saldaña Rios, A., & Chávez Epiquén, A. (2020). La Grafomotricidad y su efecto en la Preescritura en niños de cinco años en la Institución Educativa Inicial Nº 424 Jesús María – Manantay - Coronel Portillo –2018. Sendas, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.47192/rcs.v1i1.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47192/rcs.v1i1.20
Sugrañes, E. y Ángels, M. (2008). La educación psicomotriz (3-8 años). Barcelona: Graó.
Valentini, M. Valentina, L. (2018). The importance of the body in writing. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 8, 618-626.
Vallés, A. (2004). Dislexia 3. Programa para la recuperación de las dificultades lectoescritoras. Valencia: Promolibro.
Vallés, A. (2004). Dislexia 3. Programa para la recuperación de las dificultades lectoescritoras. Valencia: Promolibro.
Viso, J. R. (2003). Prevenir y reeducar la disgrafía. Madrid: ICCE.
Volman, M. J. M., van Schendel, B. M., y Jongmans, M. J. (2006). Handwriting difficulties in primary school children: A search for underlying mechanisms. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 451–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.60.4.451